Sign in or 

| Score | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Idea & Content | The ideas expressed are not original, often confused and are not connected to discussions around education or ed. technology. | The ideas expressed are not necessarily original, and are not usually connected to discussions around education or ed. technology. | The student expresses some original ideas. The majority of ideas are related to education or more specific to ed. technology. | The student has many original ideas and expresses them clearly. The great majority of ideas are related to education or more specifically to ed. technology. |
| Post Frequency | The post frequency is well below course expectations. | The post frequency is slightly below average. | The post frequency is slightly above average. | The post frequency greatly exceeds course expectations. |
| Writing Quality | Posts are of very poor quality. There is little to no evidence of reading other information in order to form new meaning of the topics at-hand. | Posts show a below average, overly casual writing style with a lack of attention to style. Students pay little attention to other reading and mostly regurgitate previous personal views. | Posts show above average writing style. The content demonstrates that the student reads moderately, and attempts to synthesize information and form new meaning. | Posts are well-written, and are characterized by elements of a strong writing style. The content demonstrates that the student is well read, synthesizes learned content and constructs new meaning. |
| Community | Students do no show evidence in any participation in the blogging community, or the course community, through the use of weblogs. | Students rarely participated in the blogging community. Most, if not all, participation was limited to the weblogs of other classmates. | The student participated moderately in the blogging community. There was some evidence of out-of-class participation. | The student participated actively in the blogging community via comments on other weblogs, and citing others in their research and writing. |
| Use of Enhancements | The student did nothing to enhance or personalize the weblog space. | There is very little evidence of multimedia enhancement and the student blog is primarily text-based. | The student enhanced their weblog to some extent using video, audio, images or other add-ons. | The student greatly enhanced their weblog space using video, audio, images or other add-ons. |
| This rubric is adapted with permission from: Ecmp355 and http://www.ryanbretag.com/blog/?p=462 | ||||
|
jutecht |
Latest page update: made by jutecht
, Feb 24 2009, 9:08 AM EST
(about this update
About This Update
377 words added view changes - complete history) |
|
More Info: links to this page
|